Che vs Mr Rogers

Who Would You Rather Follow?

Che VS Mr Rogers

I don’t know about you, but it would certainly be a whole lot more exciting to follow Che Guevara into battle for the rights of the poor, than to follow Fred Rogers into the land of Make Believe to chat with Daniel Lion. And there has been a certain corrective underway in our understanding of Jesus, moving his visage more toward the picture of Che and away from the picture of Mr. Rogers. I, myself have voiced that Jesus was more like the revolutionary leader than the docile children’s program host. But I am re-thinking my perspective.

There is certainly something about following Jesus which gets a person in trouble. Jesus was executed by religious and State authorities because he was a threat to those in power. His kingdom operates on principles which place the poor and marginalized in seats of honor. The powerful (religiously powerful, politically powerful or financially powerful) are often on the outside of this “good news to the poor” kingdom. Anyone attempting to bring Jesus' kingdom will get into the same kind of trouble Jesus did from the power-holders who get displaced by the gospel of the kingdom. Jesus promised it would be so. “Do you remember what I told you? ‘A slave is not greater than the master.’ Since they persecuted me, naturally they will persecute you.” John 15:20 (NLT). The kingdom brought by Jesus will be inherited by the meek, and the power transfer from the strong to the meek will not take place without resistance.

Although Che was rightly disturbed at the treatment of the poor, and dreamed of a world where the marginalized were given voice, he was anything but meek. He was notorious for his disciplinarian tactics, shooting defectors for abandoning his ideals. He was pleased to incite violent revolution to obtain his goals. Mr. Rogers, on the other hand, is most at home sitting on the floor playing Chutes and Ladders with a six year old. And I am pretty sure this is more descriptive of Jesus than shooting defectors. In fact, when his disciples were warring about who would be greatest, he brought a little boy or girl and had the child stand among them. "Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever becomes humble like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me." Matthew 18:3-5 (NRSV).

The kind of revolution Jesus is inciting will more likely call me to drop my career in order to care for an invalid than to “take out” a banker, CEO or political leader. Following Jesus, I mean really following him no matter what, is going to “take out” my ego before it will turn me into a hit man.

It is precisely in this downward journey of coming alongside the dispossessed that can be so threatening to those who dispossessed the outcast and the disregarded people of our world. But we don’t forsake upward mobility, fame, money, etc. to be threatening, we do it because Jesus said to even gain entrance into his kingdom we’ve got to become like children. While I chafe at Mr. Rodger’s “here-comes-Trolley” harmlessness and am drawn to the cry “CHARGE!” issued by revolutionaries, the truth is that if the meek are to inherit the earth we’re more likely to be near the center of kingdom power by getting down on the floor with Mr. Rogers than loading our weapons with Che.

Hopscotch anyone?

 

 

Comments
Kenny's Gravatar I appreciate this, particularly from the point of view of someone within the "social justice movement" that tends to idealize people like Che.

On a side note, your RSS feed isn't working :(
# Posted By Kenny | 3/10/09 6:07 PM
Andrew Ulasich's Gravatar I definitely feel the pull to the revolutionary action on behalf of the poor. I recently heard Mr. Rogers was good friends with Henri Nouwen, and that his intent for the show was to encourage and teach children to love themselves and each other. My love for Mr. Rogers went up exponentially after hearing that.
# Posted By Andrew Ulasich | 3/11/09 12:38 AM
Ben S's Gravatar Fantastic post. This dichotomy, which you summarized as Che vs. Mr. Rogers, is something I have wrestled with for a long time. You've put some of my own thoughts into sensible words, and given me more to think about. Thanks.
# Posted By Ben S | 3/12/09 4:39 PM
Kurt Schroeder's Gravatar The wonderful thing is that we can choose to follow both when it suits us. Fred Rogers was not a naiive person, but I think that he realized that in the situation he was in, doing any political advocating would only wind up alienating him to a large group of people. As it is, I think it is amazing and commendable that THROUGHOUT the web, every time I have ever seen anyone make a snide comment about Mr. Rogers, someone else was right there to say what a wonderful man he was. A person would only serve to better themselves, and those around them, by following Mr. Rogers simple message of friendship and caring.
# Posted By Kurt Schroeder | 5/29/09 8:52 PM

Disclaimer: These blogs are the words of the writers and do not represent InterVarsity or Urbana. The same is true of any comments which may be posted about any blog entries. Submitted comments may or may not be posted within the blog, at the bloggers' discretion.

learn. be. go. serve. ask.

 

"Come, let us bow down in worship, let us kneel before the LORD our Maker."

Psalms 95:6 (NIV)

 
 

Urbana Stories

“I went to Urbana 96. At that time I lived in Toronto. I really loved it and told my friends...”

read more

share your story

 

Books by Scott Bessenecker:
The New Friars: The Emerging Movement Serving the World's Poor

How to Inherit the Earth - coming in November
coming in November