AIDS in Our World
Thursday this week (Dec. 1) is World AIDS Day.
While the devastation from HIV/AIDS spreads its poison and pain equally through every day of the year, it's helpful for us to devote a special day to being reminded of the scope of this pandemic, and evaluating what we are doing and what more we can do to meet the challenge.
We all are capable of sacrificial love because we're made in God's image, and if we're followers of Jesus, we can also love out of the extent that we have embraced God's amazing love for us. God's love for us begets our love for others, above and beyond "natural" human compassion.
We are motivated by compassion; or if we find that we're not, this is a prayer that God will readily answer: Lord, give me more compassion and give me concrete opportunities to serve and love people who are affected by HIV/AIDS.
The church, while initially late to the game, is becoming increasingly involved in addressing the challenges of HIV/AIDS. In many places the church is at the very center of how communities and nations are addressing HIV/AIDS.
InterVarsity has just posted a short video about HIV/AIDS on urbana.org, watch it here.
A conference called The Church and the HIV/AIDS Pandemic was held in February 2005, with about 450 people from around the U.S. and over a dozen other countries. You can listen to the audio of most of the presentations from the conference at this website: http://www.hivaidsconference.com. There's also a list of publications, websites, and an interactive map showing where HIV/AIDS is in the world.
There are some interesting challenges that are uniquely faced by the church as it deals with this pandemic. One is the fact that the use of condoms is one of the most effective ways to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS. However, the use of condoms is often associated with sexual activity outside of marriage. Many churches understandably hesitate therefore to become involved in the distribution of condoms, not wanting to condone or encourage behavior which is contrary to Biblical teaching, even though such distribution would prevent the spread of the virus and the toll it will take.
The same dynamic happens with intravenous drug users and the initiative to provide clean needles so that shared needles do not continue to spread the virus.
If someone is going to engage in a given activity anyway, and providing a low cost product (eg. condoms, needles) would prevent them from spreading a deadly disease to others, one could argue that Christians should be willing to do this even if it is a difficult place to be ethically and morally.
One could also argue that there are reasons not to encourage morally wrong behavior.
I can't think of situations in the gospels where Jesus engaged a parallel situation that could provide us with a clear principle for our situation today. Suggestions, anyone? (see the "comments" link below)
The closest I can think of is in John 8, when people are about to stone the woman caught in adultery (btw, where did the man end up, who presumably would have been caught at the same time?). Jesus says whoever is without sin can be the first to cast a stone, and the crowd leaves one by one. He then says to the woman, "Go now, and leave your life of sin."
He rescues her first (not after she repents), extends acceptance to her, and then instructs her to change her course.
I'm not suggesting that on its own this incident translates to a principle that Christians should hand out condoms and needles. But I know it is one piece that should inform our dialog.
Honest, open, prayerful dialog across the spectrum of Christian faith and across cultures and Christians of different economic means is essential if we are to arrive at healthy conclusions about how the church should participate in the prevention of further spread of HIV/AIDS. The church in wealthy places needs to listen to and collaborate with the church in poor places, in engaging this issue.
It is not enough to close our eyes and ears and repeat moral mantras if there are things we, the church, should also be doing to participate in effective prevention. May God be our guide and give us wisdom.
In my opinion it's also not OK to have this dialog only in the sanguine protection of church basements. We need to have this dialog in the context of and including the perspective of Christians in affected communities, family members, Christians who are HIV positive. We need to work out our faith (our theology, doctrine and ethical positions are only a subset) with fear and trembling, among and along with the people who are being devastated. Not in a safe, remote location.
And it's not as if the only solutions for prevention are condoms and needles. The church and community and government in Uganda have together reduced HIV/AIDS prevalence from 14% to almost as low as 4%, largely from encouraging abstinence outside of marriage and faithfulness within marriage.
The most realistic path in many countries that are most affected may require multiple approaches at the same time, some of which are less comfortable for Christians.
The church's response to the suffering from HIV/AIDS is a lot less complicated than issues of prevention. The scope of this suffering is vast (over 40 million living with AIDS, and many millions of orphans) but the calling of Christ on those who follow him is clear here: care for the sick, suffering, the dying, and the widows and orphans, regardless of the reason for their predicament.
If this pandemic seems a bit far removed, you might be surprised to find that there are people living with AIDS tucked away in low profile places in almost every city, and one of the beautiful opportunities is to befriend and love them, build friendships and trust, serve them in small ways, and learn from them. I want to do this in my city but I confess that I have not done so yet. It will involve time, and going out of my way.


