"I came so that everyone would have life, and have it in its fullest."
- John 10:10
By the time you might read this, the scheduled execution of Crips founder Stanley Tookie Williams in California will have either seen a last minute clemency or, more likely from the looks of it, it will have already taken place.
Punishment with a Capital P is irreversable and final.
122 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice. 74 other countries and territories retain and use the death penalty, although the number of countries which actually execute prisoners in any given year is much smaller.
Last year, 97% of all known executions took place in four countries: China, Iran, Viet Nam and the USA.
Tonight with one ear I have been listening to Larry King Live on CNN, with a couple dozen people weighing in with their somewhat predictable positions on the impending execution at midnight. Family members of deceased victims; an NAACP spokesperson; a conservative Christian spokesperson; legal analysts pro and con.
I was listening for the Christian man to offer some kind of brief Biblical basis for his position of strongly favoring the death penalty, but he passed up several opportunities to do so. His, like the others, came across as a subjective opinion, based on unstated assumptions and foundations, not necessarily more correct just because it was believed or spoken. He was another fallible person just like you or me, with an opinion.
The use of the words "conservative" and "liberal" are confusing to me, especially in the North American Church.
One would think that among Christians who look to the Bible for the answers to tough questions like this, to mercifully preserve someone's life (even while they spend every remaining day in prison) would perhaps be the more "conservative" position -- erring on the side of caution in judgements in the matter of taking a human life.
And one would think that to go ahead and take the life of a criminal who was convicted for murder would be the more "liberal" position.
But today when it comes to capital punishment it appears that the more "conservative" Christian stance is generally in favor of NOT conserving the life; and the "liberal" stance is generally in favor of a measure of caution and leniency or even abolition of the death penalty since there have been many overturned convictions, and executions of people who were later proven to be innocent.
What's liberal here, and what's conservative? What do these labels mean any more?
Talking with my spouse tonight about this, I admitted I haven't made up my mind about capital punishment from a Biblical perspective. This means that given the issue, if I haven't made up my mind, I can't yet be in favor of the death penalty. That would require me to be really sure that we're sanctioned by God to take a human life for special reasons.
I have heard some credible arguments against the death penalty from a Biblical perspective of God's forgiveness, especially the ultimate, extreme, and undeserved forgiveness by Jesus for those who of us who are the reason he made his incomparable sacrifice.
I have not yet heard a credible, Biblical argument in favor of the death penalty. There may be one, but it has not darkened my door.
I think I am capable of as much "righteous indignation" as the next person, against those who do evil especially when it causes immense pain or even death to others whom God has created and loves.
Consider this capital punishment scenario in the gospels -- a woman about to be stoned to death for her offense, and Jesus seemed to say that only hypocrites or truly sinless people would qualify to carry out the sentence. His position contradicted the Law of Moses. I can't escape the image of Jesus writing in the sand as each accuser walked away one by one (perhaps one of the most honest moments of their lives) after he said that those without sin could cast the first stone.
As someone who is still wrestling with this question, here are a few thoughts:
First, I hope to never reach a comfortable conclusion on this or any other controversial issue of faith, that out of my pride or insecurity or laziness becomes closed off to any new insights or respectful dialog.
Second, I don't yet find enough weight in scripture to endorse with confidence the position of capital punishment as a reliable protocol for human communities. There's too much room for error as we try to employ human judgement which is vulnerable and, measured from God's perspective, hypocritical. The teachings of Jesus don't appear to ascribe to men or women the responsibility to judge and end life.
Third, I do believe in lowercase punishment: cautious, deliberate judgement by a legal system that is accountable to the people and aware that it too is fallible; with consequences responsibly enforced by society's correctional institutions -- imprisonment for crimes but continued care for the person, made in God's image, however flawed. This does protect society, and appropriately constricts the freedom of the person believed to be guilty.
But even this kind of legal system is elusive. In the United States, there are abuses of the system, abuses of prisoners, and some innocent people are punished while some guilty parties -- especially those who can afford better lawyers -- do escape the consequences of their illegal actions.
Fourth, an observation about American culture which ascribes, perhaps uniquely among other cultures in the world, an elevated importance of every individual forming and holding a personal opinion, and the freedom to express it. What about some issues which will take a lifetime to form an informed and balanced opinion? What about issues outside our expertise? Our culture rushes us along. "We report, you decide" as if a sound byte is enough information for the average citizen to form their own mature verdicts on a matter.
Often we hear people expressing what sounds like a hastily formed opinion. We are all capable of learning to speak with manufactured conviction, taking an oversimplified stance, unable or unwilling to acknowledge the arbitrary assumptions that form the basis for our conclusions.
And we're all capable of forming opinions without a reasonable measure of humility.
Fifth, one thing I do know with certainty is that Jesus commends us to visit those who are in prison. I have not done this for over 15 years, since the last time that someone I personally knew was imprisoned. Some people take this on as a spiritual gift and special calling. I do not think that every Christian is called to this, but rather that part of the body of Christ should be proactively involved in visiting, befriending, and loving those who are being punished and "corrected" by reasonable systems.
God created and loves every person, regardless of the sin they may have committed, however heinous. Is there some unforgiveable sin before God that warrants death beyond any alternate provision, outside the reach of forgiveness or mercy?
Which of us is ready to throw our handful of stones? When do we choose to be pro life and when do we choose to be pro death? This is complicated, and the way words and emotions get manipulated doesn't always help.
Is murder more offensive in God's eyes than the internal sins of pride, arrogance, or greed? We can speculate.
Is our theology of capital punishment consistent with our theology of war and our theology of preserving life? Hm.
Are our sins all worthy of death? According to scripture, yes.
This may be un-American, but I don't have a personal stance on the case of Stanley Tookie Williams. Maybe he did it; maybe he didn't. Maybe his trial was fair, maybe not. Maybe his exemplary change of heart and his several years of positive influence on others from prison deserves a break; maybe it doesn't.
For me, the jury is still out on what justice people should administer on God's behalf, with any degree of certainty when it comes to ending human life.
Mercy is not receiving from God what we do deserve.
Grace is receiving from God what we do not deserve.
The difference is the placement of one word.
What do you think about this?